The Provincial court of Navarra has supported in part the appeals filed by the lawyer of one of the five defendants for the alleged violation group of the san fermin festival against refusals of tests agreed by the investigating judge.
on the one hand, the court requests the magistrate to find out who called the victim by phone minutes before they are to produce the facts. In case you find out your identity, it leaves to the discretion of the judge to take or not statement to that person, “in attention to the purpose for which it may be derived from the right to the privacy of the complainant”.
According to the reports of local media, the intention of the defence of the accused is trying to prove that just before the rape in the vestibule of a building of Pamplona, in the early hours of last July 7, the girl is not warned of any danger in that conversation. The victim, 18 years of age, alleged that the accused had stolen the mobile and that just before the sexual assault had because he had made a call. The mobile was found by a woman an hour later in a nearby street to the portal.
on the other hand, the lawyer of one of the alleged attackers considers that it is necessary to know if the young man was suffering from any type of stress prior to the facts reported is motivated by anxiety at the time of completion of the test of selectivity, and if it was staffed by psychological services or psychiatric conditions.
Thus, the court considers that the judge should not give by closed still the case, as ordered last October 17. A decision that was appealed by one of the attorneys for the defendants, who had been recently added to the process and I wanted to do more research.
No comments:
Post a Comment