The odd couple – Milenio.com

So titled Glòria Serra’s your opinion on the split between José María Aznar and Mariano Rajoy. I agree that the problem comes because Aznar was not aware of the growth of Rajoy, of the respect that in these years has gotten to the inside of the Popular Party and especially how they maintained the Presidency of the Government at the time more complex.

Meanwhile, Aznar retired soon, that is why it is a former young, with too many willing to help. In summary, the more I appreciate that you may have among your people, the boss is another.

it seems to Me timely to the conclusion that it was a mistake. To get away from an institution of power as it is the party that brought him to the Presidency dwarfs Aznar and away from the protection.

recurrent Phenomenon this of breaks in the policy. Betrayal for some, the simple denial to others. Jeambar and Roucaute we clearly explain in "in Praise of treason" as these games of denial and corrections are a necessary mechanism in a healthy democracy.

immobility is the enemy of progress and development, the denial involves in large measure to recognize that society changes, that are looking for new solutions, and that it agrees in not a few occasions to break with the past, with the ancestors, and even with the parties.

Hundreds of examples are there in the classic books and recent history. Today are Rajoy and Aznar in Spain. But also in France we see as Valls will compete the presidency to his co-religionist and current president Francois Hollande. As in his time happened to Chirac and Mitterrand, or to Gorbachev in Russia. In the world is something of the newspaper, I don’t know the reason, but the mexicans still we are surprised quite.

we Loaded up the denial with a huge pejorative sense. The meaning that we give to loyalty is confused with the immobility, the only enemy is true of a society vibrant and dynamic.

The odd couple who now represent Aznar and Rajoy not to remember what did Aznar to Fraga. Be surprised by a denial in politics and to denounce a betrayal is nothing more than ignore the basic rule of the game, or in default hides the desire to rein in the society, whose only constant in history is the mobility.