Today testify before Judge of Instruction No. 14 Madrid, Carlos Valle, national police and mobility that had some relation to the traffic incident starring Esperanza Aguirre on 3 April in the Gran Vía, where he parked his car in a bus lane and left the place without waiting for was notified the appropriate sanction. Among those appearing include the mobility agent who reported to the president of the PP, which is arrived in the case as a civil party, allegedly for trying to run him over when he left his vehicle on the scene.
Regarding the alleged injuries suffered, are specially noteworthy two medical reports. In the first one, issued on April 4, a day after the event, the attending you at the center of health mutual to which it belongs, noted in its opinion that the patient, the mobility agent in question, reports that the car-the Esperanza Aguirre did not obey orders to stop and it was a “tense situation” point when “retreated, tried stopping the vehicle.” Whether the car came Aguirre will give a blow, he said the following, as recorded in the medical report: “Not sure if it hits you-the vehicle-but after a while begins with pain in the anterior knee left. ” On examination, it does not detect any erythema or hematoma. However, the medical report of the previous day itself said the doctor who attended him that the car tried to “run over”. In that first attendance she was diagnosed with “bruises.”
The second relevant report is issued by the coroner’s court, after appropriate medical examination, on 8 May. Your opinion refers to the first two medical assists he had, on 3 and 4 April, in which he complained of pain in the patellar tendon of the knee, although “the examination was without objective findings of injury.” In this case, the coroner concluded, the absence of objective signs of injury, “although paths examinations, three hours and 40 hours after the fact” does not allow “or the reality of the injury or medicolegal causation. “
The coroner finds that the absence of signs does not mean that the injury referred by the mobility agent had not existed , “but only consist subjective symptoms reported by the reporting itself, and no objective evidence to confirm the lesion with the security required from a forensic setting.” His conclusion of all this is sharp. “No objective signs consist of injury, can not be considered established a medical-legal causation.” On this issue, Esperanza Aguirre in his statement to the judge ruled exclusively by REASON last Tuesday, said that at no time was given to the ‘leakage’ or that ‘injured an officer. “
No comments:
Post a Comment