The Parliament of Cantabria approved Monday an initiative reproving the Government of Cantabria, following statements in full the Minister of Industry of the regional government, Francisco Martin.
And, specifically, by the answer given in the same Parliament on March 28 that the government had not moved “a role” on his performance as an accusation Racing case (where is personado private prosecution, to be subject to the Cantabrian coffers through public company CANTUR, which depends on Industry).
But soon transpired that the same day he had fired the assigned lawyer, Javier Noriega, as advanced GOOD AFTERNOON CANTABRIA.
The lawyer Javier Noriega
condemnation has come forward thanks to the sum of the votes of all opposition, PP, Citizens and Podemos, totaling majority against groups of government, PSOE and PRC.
it is we who introduced this reproof, as it was in your question that Martin obviated have to plenary on the change of counsel.
with this action, calling them “erratic and confused”, Alberto Bolado has criticized the government for this “absolutely unfortunate decision” no longer considered to see that this “seems that the Government intended to influence the case.”
it has therefore requested that the Government, as it has already been done after the intervention of Revilla, who hold Javier Noriega lawyer leading the charge. In addition, the proposal includes a request that in future cases involving as prejudiced public companies defend the legal services of government is assigned.
The other opposition parties, Citizens and PP, they have supported the proposal. Ruben Gomez (Citizens) has criticized the Government is “so little business” to dismiss the lawyer the same day said they had not moved a role in the cause; and the subsequent actions of the Prime Minister.
“President Revilla said he knew nothing when he says in all the media that a president should know everything that happens in your party. Do you know everything that happens in his party but not everything that happens in your government? “He asked jokingly.
The spokesman, Eduardo Van Den Eynde, said the counselor he incurred “an objective and conscious lie” to say that he had not changed a single paper. Furthermore, he believes that this “shamble”, the attempt to change lawyers, has been carried out with the intention of “trying to weaken the prosecution” for the benefit of Angel Agudo and Javier López Marcano, defendants in the case.
PSOE and PRC CHARGED AGAINST tHE DEVELOPMENT oF tHE QUESTION tO MARTIN
the parties that support the government have reacted to proposition attacking Podemos, showing that the agreement came when these they allowed the investiture of Revilla is increasingly tense.
the regionalist spokesman, Pedro Hernando, has pleaded “concerned about this new policy,” and believes that the action we “witness to discredit a reality of parliamentary instruments “.
Hernando has clarified that the deputy Podemos” made a very clear question “which did not include questions about changing lawyers, although they already were rumors from that morning. “The government has responded even above their obligations,” he assured.
He also clarified that, after finishing the full, Bolado counselor came to say he had not had time to ask about Noriega, Martin what he proceeded to relate the resolution of the Board of CANTUR. It therefore considers that reprobation is “based on lies” to “their photos taken before the media”.
In response, Bolado has insisted that his job is to oversee the government and not “say counselor how to do their job, “because you assume” capacity and expertise “to know that” change of lawyer in a case in which the government has a conflict of interest is a substantial change must disclose to the camera “.
has also accused them of trying to tell their shenanigans outside the city to try to make” an accomplice “.
Hernando has also said it is” absolutely legitimate CANTUR choose their lawyers, “saying that Noriega was” named and indoctrinated in their approach to defense by the PP government. ” And the order of Revilla was due to the possible doubts that such a change could raise.
By the Socialist Party, Guillermo del Corral believes that the statements of Martin “in any way collided” with change lawyer, because the question we were very specific about whether the Government intended to withdraw the charge.
CASE RACING
the Case Cantur stands in the Provincial Court, pending that the resources of the defendants and the prosecution are resolved, after the order of May 11, 2015 to put the accused on the edge of the bench, but after the resignation of his deputy act of the accused Francisco Javier López Marcano the matter was . to the ordinary courts
in addition to Marcano, they are charged with the exconsejero of Economy and current president of the PSOE, Angel Agudo; the head of the public company that funneled CEP Cantabria operations, Luis Egusquiza; outside counsel who advised government operations, Racing Emiliano Garayar; the entrepreneur who was shareholder of Racing allegedly benefited from the sale of Racing in 2011, James Montalvo and his company Dumviro Ventures.
The first investigating judge of the case, Paz Hidalgo, raised the asset impairment 43 , 8 million euros and urged CEP Cantabria that personam to defend the public interest, because much of the loss of money came from this public company.
reluctantly, CEP presented himself and he came to bring charges against those under investigation. Although eventually the July 2, 2015, and with the PP government in office, he retired from the prosecution.
At the end of that month, on July 29, the Office downgraded the charges and the seriousness of the facts under investigation. Two weeks earlier he had resigned Yisascharov Cantabria, José Ignacio fabric
.
No comments:
Post a Comment