The Andalusian PSOE win elections and obtained 44 seats, 10 more than the PP but 11 less than necessary to achieve an absolute majority, according to the survey of the Centre for Sociological Research (CIS) Pre March 22 elections.
The barometer of CIS, held on 30 January and February 17 from 3,130 interviews, predicts that the Socialists lost three seats compared to the 2012 elections, but which benefit the sinking of the PP, which would rise from 50-34 deputies.
The survey predicts can breakthrough, with between 21 and 22 seats , the entry of Citizens with five deputies and the collapse of IU, which would fall from 12 seats to four to five.
UPyD would be to out of a Parliament in which Susana Díaz depend on possible agreements with PP or can to govern with stability.
The Socialists would get 34.7% of the vote, nine points more than the PP (25.7%), while 19.2% can reach, IU 6 , 6% and 6.4% Citizens.
However, direct voting intention we even exceeds the PP (13.7% from 12.8%), although is far from the Socialists, who received 25.5% of the responses.
32.9% of the Andalusian wants repeat Susana Díaz charge
The 32.9% of Andalusian preferred that the current President of the Board and Socialist candidate, Susana Díaz, repeat in office, compared with 9.9% who opts for the PP candidate, Juan Manuel Moreno, and 2.8% for the candidate of IU, Antonio Maíllo.
In the survey does not ask nor by Teresa Rodríguez (can) or by Juan Marín (Citizens), but under “other” received 23.8% of the vote.
The 43.7% of the Andalusian not know Juanma Moreno , which values only 44.5% of respondents. In the case of Antonio Maíllo the level of ignorance rises to 46%.
These data contrast those of Susana Díaz, valued by 83.7% of respondents and only unknown 5.5% of them.
21.4% of the Andalusian argues that management Diaz as president was “good” or “very good” and 30% opinion that it was “bad” or “very bad”. The work of the PP in opposition is labeled a “bad” or “very bad” for the 61.79% of Andalusian and only rated as “good” or “very good” by 5.4%.
No comments:
Post a Comment