The full Parliament of Cantabria has unanimously approved the creation of a commission of inquiry to clarify what happened to the 18 million euros that the Government contributed to Ecomasa-Nestor Martin.
The company , brought by former President Ignacio Diego as a solution to ERE Teka 88 workers, has definitely closed Monday after workers receive their last 50 slips.
The judicial process is already underway and the Government itself has joined the lawsuit filed by the workers after so by indicating the prosecution.
The Commission of Inquiry will be brought to the Bureau of Parliament which will raise the appropriate agency. All camera groups have supported its creation, even the Popular Party, which many considered politically responsible for what the former employees called “scam”.
In fact, the popular spokesman, Eduardo Van den Eynde, has assured that the welcome that will be considered “highly explanatory.” “There are people that has ruled before the commission of inquiry, and that can not be done,” reiterated the PP spokesman in the Cantabrian Parliament.
Van den Eynde has insisted that what It happened to the company was a “liquidity problem” which would have gone ahead “of having carried out the agreements that were approved in full.” Therefore, he has accused the current PRC-PSOE to “kill” the project “a political vendetta” that, in his opinion, was carried out “above the interests of workers’ government.
Nevertheless, it has expressed its agreement on the creation of this commission “because they are exemplifying”, and recalling that the PRC and the PSOE did the same with the commissions created to investigate cases of GFB and CANTUR (later Case Racing de Santander).
Van den Eynde has rescued the words of Eva Díaz Tezanos who spoke circus, and look back with full revenge.
“DIRECTORS OF INDUSTRY HAVE PLAYED TO BE ENTREPRENEURS “
The other parties have supported the creation of this commission of inquiry. “The public capital must manage with a minimum of responsibility,” insisted Deputy Citizen, Juan Ramon Carrancio, spoiling other cases, such as GFB and Racing, and especially the Ecomasa-Nestor Martin because “if something has shocked Cantabrian society is that the Minister of Industry have played to be entrepreneurs with the money of all. “
In the same line has been expressed José Ramón Blanco (Podemos), who has stressed that the commission serve to find out what happened to the 18 million euros public, and also of the 3.2 million contributed by workers and their corresponding compensation.
“We want to show that the Government of Cantabria is responsible for this scam and that as an institution should be responsible for this compensation, “said White, who has said he does not want this committee to be used for” stone the PP “but serves to see what has failed, “and lay the foundation for not to repeat these mistakes.”
“We want a judicial inquiry opens the door to recover the public money contributed,” she added Silvia Abascal, Socialist spokesman, He has embraced a commission of inquiry to “settle whether there was political responsibility” in this process.
The former workers have rallied outside parliament
and former workers Ecomasa-Nestor Martin company have rallied outside parliament of Cantabria, to express their anger with the political decisions that were made in his case.
Just last Monday the 50 workers have received their pink slips, closing down the company, precisely coinciding with the third anniversary of the start their march.
Several dozen workers have received the former president of Cantabria, Ignacio Diego, who was the union between the Government, workers and managers TEKA Ecomasa-Nestor Martin, Andres de Leon and Jesus Lavin. They have done screaming, rebuking their participation in the “scam” that so far has prevented to charge more than 33% of the compensation due to them.
Four of these former employees have crossed Street and have crept into the courtyard of Parliament, following Diego. Although security has been immediately alert his intervention was not necessary because Nacho Diego finally has stopped and has been talking to them for a quarter of an hour. During this time they insisted that the company did have a viability plan, although external experts have ruled that it was not strong enough.
APPROVAL OF A PROTOCOL FOR BULLYING BY IDENTITY GENDER
Also unanimously approved the motion by citizens on bullying. This proposition of law is on the establishment of a protocol in situations of bullying based on sexual orientation or gender identity, which would be integrated into the existing protocol in the region.
This type violence has come to the fore after the suicide last December, Allan, a transsexual guy who could not stand the harassment to which he was subjected by their gender identity.
“All consciousness here is little “stressed Deputy Citizen, Ruben Gomez, who has acknowledged that” this Ministry walking in the right direction “in the fight against bullying; “It is fair to recognize their work.”
To add this specific protocol, Gomez has called “work with those who have suffered in their own flesh such harassment.” They have therefore demanded maximum participation in the preparation of this protocol entities, schools, parents’ associations, political parties and the general public.
Since I could not miss the jarring point, the deputy of the PRC, Mary Teresa Noceda, said that they are already doing more than enough action from the Department, and has accused Citizens of getting around “opportunism and media effort.”
At the same time, Noceda reminded the PP “necessary tool” to raise awareness of this issue was the subject Education for Citizenship, “which met with a recommendation of the Council of Europe” and was suppressed appearing across the board in the LOMCE, better known as Law Wert
Parliament continues to support BULLFIGHTING
Meanwhile, we are left alone trying to amend the Law of Cantabria for the protection of animals, which also include bullfighting.
Veronica Ordonez defended, supported in the polls, the majority of Spanish society rejects bullfighting considering “archaic” and “a clear example of animal abuse.”
Although the spokesman socialist, Victor del Corral, he is in favor of his calling bullfighting “example of brutality,” the PSOE has been limited to abstain on this motion, which have rejected the PP, the PRC and citizens.
Ironically all have begun by assuring be totally against animal abuse, but the three parties have refused to support the motion. Ruben Gomez believes that banning bullfighting is “interventionism” and “lead culture” and has said for his part that this “has fans that guarantee its economic viability”, although recent surveys and published data do not show well.
Since the PRC has ensured that “interestingly mixed bullfighting and animal abuse” and the PP demanded respect for these tastes. “We become convinced that torture is not culture,” insisted Veronica Ordonez in his final appearance
.
No comments:
Post a Comment