Opinion article or Constitutional Court Investiture – The Sol de Nayarit

 It is not reasonable or legitimate that Article 99 of the Constitution are reinterpreted, in the interests of a party. The literal interpretation is the only valid and correct. And if there is doubt, by the government, to consult the Constitutional Court supreme interpreter of the Constitution. . And rightful interpretation of constitutional principles

 
 it is not the interpretation of the letter, carried by members of the caretaker government and the Popular Party. Rajoy has the constitutional obligation to report to the investiture session, the exceeding or not. Not doing so is, in my opinion, violate the Constitution clearly and unambiguously. The question of unconstitutionality can be raised against acts with force of law of the State, etc.

 In addition, the political deadlock will continue, if there is a first investiture vote and could not summon third elections, unless misinterpret or distort the Constitution, as this possibility is not regulated explicitly in the text of the Constitution.

 So that Article 99 provides for a possibility and therefore does not prohibit other is a complete fallacy. Because with this kind of argument any case law or legal interpretation of a constitutional article is warranted.

 A presidential candidate must meet government literally what the Constitution says, because it is their legal obligation. Regardless, that will be beneficial or harmful to their hold on power. In the case of

Pedro Sanchez he agreed to be a candidate and presented to the investiture with the negative result is already known. He fulfilled what the Constitution says. Although he was aware that he would lose the vote. From an ethical perspective attitude it is perfect.

 Because pragmatism has its limits. should not misrepresent the correct and literal interpretation of Article 99 for political purposes. And it seems that is being done. We are in a state of law, but if the endowment is not celebrated and elections are called third, in my opinion, will be performing something clearly unconstitutional.

 All opposition to the Popular Party is arguing that Rajoy has to present its program and apply trust, through the feedback of investiture, win or lose.

 I believe that the judiciary should not remain aloof from what is happening with this travesty of a constitutional article. It should intervene in accordance with the terms of its functions and powers. Otherwise, the quality of our democracy will be reduced.