Palma, December 9 (EFE) .- The prosecutor Pedro Horrach today called on the judge in the case Nóos, José Castro which does not bring to justice the Infanta Cristina because there is no evidence to charge her, although he claims to return, as civilly liable for profit, 587,413 euros of which benefited through fraud of her husband, Iñaki Urdangarin.
To the Duke of Palma the prosecution requested a sentence of 19.5 years in prison as institutional and commercial manager of Nóos Institute, of which he was the “ideal for customers and noticeably increase the fees hook” under the IP address Diego Torres , who asked to 16.5 years in prison.
Five of the accusing party to the case Nóos recorded this morning its provisional written to the magistrate number 3 of Palma and the one that asks for trial to the Infanta Cristina is the union Clean Hands, which claims to be sentenced to eight years in prison and pay 2 million fine for serving “scaffolding must” for her husband to commit tax crimes and profiting “for their own benefit.”
The lawyer of the Infanta, Miquel Roca, is confident that he will be acquitted and has already predicted that record on Money court asking the prosecutor to “leave so your liability extinguished simultaneously criminal”.
Horrach Dona Cristina has dedicated two additional annexes to the brief, the first to explain that sees its complaint as cooperator two alleged crimes prosecutors Iñaki Urdangarin is based only on “suspicion” and “mere conjecture”, so the Court of Palma violates their right to the presumption of innocence and helplessness he creates.
On the other asserts that the trial judge Nóos, José Castro, should apply the Law of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Procedure Act) and jurisprudence derived from it (including the doctrines Booty and Atutxa) and file the case to the Infanta Cristina, why not accuse or Attorney and the State Bar.
Horrach considers that the union Clean Hands can not “usurp legitimacy” prosecutorial and Advocacy alone sustain the allegation to the Infanta and if Castro decided otherwise establish distinctions where the law does not and would create “a new doctrine.”
He appeals to “basic reasons of justice, equality and legal certainty” for the same criteria as in an identical case in which the Court of Vizcaya determined that the Prosecution could not by itself open trial against the accused by the prosecution and the private prosecution for an offense against Hacienda is applied.
The prosecutor asked in total sentences totaling 107 years in prison for 14 of the 20 accused in the case Nóos. Want Urdangarin is sentenced to 19.5 years and his former partner Diego Torres to 14.5. For Torres’s wife, Ana Maria Tejeiro asks two years in prison for laundering and returns 1,144,240 euros.
Clean Hands has presented eight different criminal charges against 20 defendants types and claim penalties add 238 and a half years, from 26.5 years to Urdangarin for embezzlement, fraud, forgery, fraud, tax offenses and two laundering, 22.5 years for the same for Torres and 19.5 years for Tejeiro.
The Valencia exercises civil action as impaired and has joined the skills that have made the prosecution.
The socialist municipal group of the City of Valencia has also announced the presentation of indictment in asking 11 years in prison for the deputy mayor of Valencia, Alfonso Grau ( PP ), the same as for Urdangarin and Torres.
Among the nearly 400 witnesses that the accusations want subpoena in court include former vice president Rodrigo Rato Government; the mayor of Valencia, Rita Barberá; former Minister of Justice, Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón; Valencia president Francisco Camps , and Alberto Aza, who was chief of the King’s House.
could also go to testify at trial sports personalities such as former presidents of Valencia Francisco Roig, Juan Bautista Soler y Vicente Soriano , and Villarreal president Fernando Roig, who also contracted with the Institute Nóos or group companies, as well as the rider exdirector José Miguel Echavarri basketball and former player José Antonio Montero.
After studying the writings registered today, Judge Jose Castro shall rule for trial, expected before the end of the year.
The order is not appealable relative to those against the judge open trial, but may be appealed if the judge does not include any defendant against whom prosecution has been made.
After the car Opening of trial defenses must submit their written and then the procedure will be sent to the Provincial Court of Palma to put the trial date, which could be in late 2015 or early 2016.
be held
(EFE)
No comments:
Post a Comment