ad
January 8, 2015 • 11:52
<-! - // // Updated 06/13/2014 at> <- // NAO & Eacute; BBC - INI // -> <- // Author Home // -> <- Author fim // // -> <- // NAO & Eacute!!!; BBC - FIM // ->
The Superior Court of Catalonia (TSJC) said today that seen indications that the Catalan President, Artur Mas it could be a crime of disobedience to disobey the order of suspension of alternative sovereignty query 9 last November (9N).
The query was suspended by the Constitutional Court after admitting admissible one appeal by the Spanish government, which considers it illegal and unconstitutional.
In several reported today cars, Catalan court explained its decision of 22 December admit admissible complaints and denunciations by the 9N and research Mas and counselors Joana Ortega and Irene Rigau for alleged disobedience to the Constitution.
The Constitutional Court suspended this alternative to grant leave to appeal by the Spanish government consultation.
same happened with a previous appeal on the initial plans of the Executive of Catalonia to make a sovereigntist consultation.
In the car he is declared admissible the complaint of the Prosecutor, the TSJC argues that there are indications that the “specific and determined” suspension of neat alternative consultation by the Constitutional November 4 “was not allegedly observed by the defendants.”
The Catalan Executive continued with the preparation of the consultation “with the fact way “to conduct the ratings in public buildings, of what is publicly blamed the Mas itself.
In this way, the high court concludes that Catalan Mas, Ortega and Rigau may have incurred allegedly a crime of disobedience to judgments made by public authority and, where appropriate, depending on the result of research carried out, of corruption and misappropriation of public funds.
In the file, Catalan high court reasoned that “it is common knowledge” that Mas declined to conduct the initially planned before the suspension ordered by the Constitutional Court sovereigntist consultation on September 29.
However, the TSJC recalls that, once Mas became the initial consultation on a public participation process, the PP government formulated a new challenge before the Constitutional, the November 4 suspended provisionally the sovereignist vote “concrete and particular” form.
To proceed with the inquiry, the TSJC understood But Ortega and Rigau “effectively deprived apparently” the content of the preventive suspension ordered by the Constitutional before the tribunal could definitely pronounce in judgment on the merits
“with the subsequent irreversible effects that these behaviors were caused,” added the documents.The TSJC stresses that, as stated in the complaint of the Prosecutor, the Catalan president “publicly blamed” for the conclusion of the consultation.
The November 9 2.3 million Catalans took part in a popular vote without binding force, sponsored by various nationalist groups in the region.
The Government Spanish considers unconstitutional convening a sovereigntist consultation in Catalonia, which is why he turned the initiative to the Constitutional Court.
No comments:
Post a Comment