The open within UPyD after the results of the 25-M about the desirability of reaching a political alliance with Citizens to go to the next elections root formation continues despite discussion virulently position contrary to your address.
Over 200 members have already signed a text in which the arguments put forward in this regard by his headliner in the last European elections support, Professor Francisco Sosa Wagner , also in regards to regret “authoritarian situations” and to claim that the game Rosa Díez act “above personalities of one kind or another.”
The signatories, who are expected to grow in the coming days, are MEP Fernando Maura , the regional deputy in the Assembly of Madrid Alberto Reyero and 12 councilors, as the magenta training brunete reported that they had tried comprarla-, plus 30 other organic positions in Spain. There are four members of his National Political Council, a number of regional councils and numerous delegates and local coordinators.
Including Sosa Wagner, and 15 are elected officials who ask UPyD to your address agree to explore the possibility of reaching agreements with Citizens , about 10% of the 156 are there in the game, adding five national deputies 10 autonomous (eight in Madrid, one in the Basque Country and other in Asturias), four in the Brussels Parliament and 137 mayors across the country. In the municipal elections of 2011, the formation actually scored 152 councilors, but since then have left 15 UPyD differences or been expelled.
The text refers to the freedom of expression of the professor, as pointing that “unfortunately we regret that the proposal has been received Sosa Wagner inelegantly by various members of the leadership of our party.” “Some of them have been limited to attacking Sosa Wagner personally, instead of calmly discussing what he suggested. repudiate the offensive style of political discussion “they add.
” Others have stated that what you propose is impossible, based on what was agreed at our last congress (November 2013). The truth, however, is that there is no formal resolution approved there to prevent dialogue and, ultimately, some kind of pact with Citizens “continue, adding that” UPyD always been precious to be a different game to others ‘, so that’ we can not fall into the lynching of dissent. ” “The situation in Spain is found particularly serious, with anti-nationalist forces and parties-in the Background- harassing our still young democracy,” they conclude.
The initiative beats the feeling alert part of cadres and party members after the European elections, which means that UPyD grew below their expectations moderate voting collect fleeing traditionally majority formations, which plummeted. In that sense, among these critics fear not exceed parliamentary irrelevance in the next elections in the foreseeable fragmentation scenario surveys predict strong breakthrough can be seen, and the results are seen as Citizens eloquent, especially in Madrid. Concerned that UPyD has already approached what could be the electoral ceiling Rosa Díez.
Caustic response offered the party leadership’s proposal-the Sosa Wagner responsible for Political Action, Carlos Martinez Gorriarán , even said it is “pure political corruption” and the deputy I rene Lozano wrote will be difficult for anyone to match it in “meanness” – has caused deep unrest, deepening the already existing between that sector and therefore considers internal discrepacias authoritarian responses.
Just this Friday UPyD Board meets, being entirely unlikely to change its position.
- A few days ago, MEP Francisco Sosa Wagner UPyD in El Mundo published an article in which among other things, suggested opening a debate in our party to improve the regenerative work we are already doing. A work that has led us to become the benchmark for many citizens in the defense of the fight against corruption, against nationalism, against the devastating effects of the economic and political crisis.
The debate MEP Sosa Wagner had proposed to develop two main axes. The first, already suggested Fernando Savater our Second Congress and was hailed for it, and also a few days ago has reiterated, was that estudiásemos the possibility of reaching agreements with a game in many related senses (though not identical) to us: Citizens. The second was to address an analysis of how certain situations could be happening in our party authoritarianism, resulting in discouragement and curb our growth this could entail.
Regardless of the position of each us on those two topics for dialogue, we believe in freedom of Sosa Wagner, and any other member, to raise them at any time. No wonder our bylaws state that is one of our fundamental rights as members publicly express our “views on political issues” and so manifest our “agreement or disagreement with the official party line” (Article 7.10). We also believe that there are two debates necessary for UPyD continues to offer society a most sensible possible answer to their problems.
Unfortunately we regret that the proposal Sosa Wagner has been received inelegantly by various members of the leadership of our party. Some of them have been limited to attacking Sosa Wagner personally, instead of calmly discussing what he suggested. We condemn this offensive style of political discussion. Others have stated that what you propose is impossible, based on what was agreed at our last congress (November 2013). The truth however is that there exists no official resolution adopted to prevent dialogue or, ultimately, some kind of pact with Citizens. And our bylaws, there endorsed explicitly recognize the possibility of coalitions or pacts with other political forces at any time (Article 30.2.d).
UPyD always has prided itself to be a different game to others. We can not fall into the lynching of dissenting. UPyD always been precious to be a decidedly democratic party. We can not, at the mere suggestion of open democratic debate on certain issues, attack suggests that, rather than debate them calmly in a format that could be, for example, an extraordinary congress. The situation in Spain is found particularly serious, with anti-nationalist forces and harassing our games, at heart, still young democracy. It is time for dialogue and imaginative solutions. Above the opinion of each, above personalities of one kind or another, we must never forget that there is something more important that we required. Something we call Spain.
S e are a group of members and supporters of Union Progress and Democracy .
No comments:
Post a Comment