Several members of Board of Tourism Valencia Foundation who declared on Saturday in the City of Justice before Judge Jose Castro who instructs the case Nóos have ensured that they were called from the foundation to meeting to prepare returns.
This has been shown to journalists legal Clean Hands Virginia Lopez and PSOE Sandra Gomez, who exercise popular action , as he left the court premises after the conclusion of witness .
Gómez said that “several of the patrons” who have declared this Saturday have stated that “since the founding” and from the “environment” Deputy Mayor of Valencia , Alfonso Grau, “had summoned them to a meeting to prepare the statement.”
According literate popular action was two meetings , one in April before first statements and other last November 26, at 1900 hours, two days before his summons before the judge Castro.
The judge said Castro off the courts that “has not changed when the status of any witnesses, “although he added that” this cause us holds many surprises every day you say for now in anticipation, but for now everything is as it was “.
Asked if” there have been some surprises “in reference to the statements of the lawyers of the popular action potential false testimony of one witness, replied that ” no can reveal “ what has been said in the room.
On the possible opening of a Additional diligence , commented that” we must assess what has been said, “and that” if you have to take some enterprise will “, without specifying which.
Virginia Lopez has ensured that the depositions on Saturday” has been accredited by part of some witnesses “that from the foundation” were called and the first statement before coming to court, and become them to summon all the employers a meeting on November 26. “
According to Lopez, one witness said in court that at the first meeting that was called” the feeling I had, though formally to discuss questions they could they do and how they could go declarations “, was that the real reason was for ” unify criteria “ in their statements to the judge Castro.
The foundation wanted to talk with employers so that it could presumably change something to benefit Alfonso Grau According to counsel, this testimony could lead to the “opening of another cause perjury “and considered” unacceptable “that these facts” are shared by counsel. “
These testimonies, has added further demonstrate that” Mr. Grau wanted return to repeated these statements “and that these meetings” all makes sense. “
” The foundation wanted to talk to employers that you really could presumably change something benefit “of Alfonso Grau , has asserted Lopez, who has also reported that the second meeting was convened by the deputy director of the Foundation, by order of the director, José Salinas.
According to the lawyer, the witness “has denied” meetings but when he recalled that he could fall to perjury “has begun to assume that such meetings could have been done”.
Sandra Gomez has reported that the testimonies on Saturday “has become clear that the foundation is public” , that the agreement “ was handled irregularly ” and that “no control over the money given to the institute Nóos” or “justification”.
“Many employers and Salinas himself has confirmed that who presented the project the Board was Mr. Alfonso Grau “he added.
At the exit of the City of Justice, José Salinas has stated to the media that said that in his statement “has been limited to ratify the statements record” and that “it has clarified some concepts have asked the parties”.
No comments:
Post a Comment