MADRID, Spain, June 12. 2015.- New measure to King Philip VI, as promised in his speech of proclamation, ensure the dignity of the monarchy and preserve the conduct of this institution is full, honest and transparent .
A path that began so early in his reign and about to turn one year continues to demonstrate the throne.
A test (although this is difficult because of a decision unprecedented in the history of Spain) that is Monarch before brother, was the decision to revoke the title of Duchess of Palma to the least of his sisters, Princess Cristina.
A title awarded his father Don Juan Carlos I in 1997 when he married Inaki Urdangarin.
The Infanta and her husband therefore, no longer the Dukes of Palma, but this does not mean that it has divested its dynastic rights . Cristina remains sixth in line to the throne of Spain, and only they, can waive this right, no one’s denying that.
With this decision of Philip VI the new code is driven tax conduct and transparency to bring the monarchy of institutional crisis that led the Nóos case, the alleged irregular business of his brother Inaki Urdangarin who have splashed the Infanta Cristina.
The sister of King the city could judge for alleged tax evasion A city that is well above without the Duchy of Palma.
and due to popular pressure and other political groups, removed his name from the Dukes street Palma.
At that time the City was ruled by the conservative Popular Party gave in to pressure.
But now after the elections for mayor, there is a sign change politician in this council, and will be the groups on the political left who stay in front. The same people who had asked the King to revoke the duchy.
The capital of Majorca Island, which has always welcomed the royal family during their summer holidays, as there has with National Heritage Palace Marivent has seen in recent years to grow to the youngest daughter of Don Juan Carlos between water sports and exemplary behavior.
Until five years ago when it was uncovered as part of a web of political corruption case the Nóos Institute a non-profit company run by Inaki Urdangarin offering event planning for companies and governments.
The company was awarded contracts to finger worth more than six million euros in three years. To carry out the work contracted to the services of private companies that do have an economic benefit, which coincidentally belonged to the husband of the Infanta and her partner. One such company is Aizoon who shared 50% Cristina and Inaki Urdangarin.
This joint venture supposedly (is what is now judges) did not declare to the Treasury benefits committing tax fraud under knowledge of the Infanta.
Now this same city that he shared with the Infanta his passion for the sea and sailing of the Bourbons, could see sitting on the dock at the King’s sister.
It will be in the coming days when the opening of the trial is decided, and there will eventually deciding whether the Infanta still charged two alleged crimes prosecutors in their role as a cooperator necessary.
Although the Infanta could get out of going to trial, if finally the allegations made by his defense are taken into account.
It is therefore crucial the account during the hearing of experts from the Tax Office who they argue that the Infanta made no fraud and that the doctrine Booty establishing if there is a demand for the charge can not be the judge to apply.
The only charge that remains is the Infanta culprit is the union Clean Hands.
Yolanda Fernandez
No comments:
Post a Comment