I wonder who will tell Mariano Rajoy Artur Mas in the letter probably has drafted during the long trip from Australia to Spain. The president said goodbye to the ‘top’ of the G-20 in Brisbane with a press conference in which he spoke much of Catalonia climate change or frightened Putin, angered by the criticisms he received after moreover unpresentable performance in Ukraine. In fact, the next trip to Catalonia Rajoy has held more headlines than his stay at odds with leaders like Merkel, Obama, Cameron and others. Symptomatic, no doubt.
Of course not know, and this is typical of how Spanish politicians behave, and not only Spaniards, which says the president of the Generalitat to the head of the central government Spain in the letter he sent, boosted after 2.25 million votes, immediately after, Sunday 9th, peaceful and quite massive round of “informal” vote about the two questions that included the possibility is register of moving towards independence. But he is arrogant, and Rajoy seems like beached, according to many commentators, from populating digital to The Economist , the last number has fallen, say, like a bomb in the Moncloa although its main tenant always presumed not to any case to the media.
Artur Mas checks that is mounted to a small conflict between the central government and the prosecution on account of filing, or otherwise, sanctions against the Government’s performance on that day, which Mas want to be a before and an after, 9-N. Too well he knows that there will be sanctions. In his letter, surely speaks-what reliable sources in Barcelona ratifies the need to go to a ‘real referendum’, in which the Catalans decide whether or not to go towards independence from the rest of Spain. He believes that he has done very well the ‘test’, which obviously was not meant to be such. Conversely, Rajoy said in his press conference last Wednesday had been ‘a failure’. So since the diagnosis begin, as expected, differences.
Says Rajoy who will initiate an immediate (short and limited) tour of Catalonia which monclovita advice is now defining and delimiting to be successful. Want to send a message of peace, reconciliation, cooperation, Catalans. It is assumed that, above all, those Catalans, four million, which were not to vote Sunday 9 Rajoy and attributes, without further data, an anti-independence will. Maybe so, maybe not. Define what you want the silent majority is always difficult and risky. Rajoy can not go wrong in that analysis. Neither the analysis of what ‘we’, a move the head of government tends to minimize, which was expected, but it has its own journey that neither Rajoy, neither Pedro Sanchez on Sunday in search of their own headlines with Susana Díaz, can no longer ignore serious risk of destabilization of their own groups. . And the system, by the way
So return Rajoy Brisbane is full of challenges: Pablo Iglesias wants to load the ‘lock 78′, ie, the current Constitution, and Sanchez, invites you to alter. And Artur Mas wants, of course, skip it. The proposal of the Prime Minister, consisting basically leave everything as it is, is unrealistic. So Rajoy will have to act decisively, more convincing than it showed in his press conference last Wednesday and Saturday in Australia. You can not send what happened on Saturday at the Apollo Theater New Madrid scenario can act, in which the Churches invited loaded ‘lock 78′, with a simple and dismissive “they say ignorance.” Certainly neither churches nor their environment seem well versed in the history of the last forty years, but it may be many citizens who also ignore, ignorance or willfully, the greatness, and the miseries of the transition: we must explain, not despise anyone.
Throwing balls out, accusing the purpose if any thrown off the field, something that is hardly worth opposing team. As it is difficult to understand who has not already called for Mas ‘in consultations’. Neither Sanchez to undertake together the ‘Catalan crusade. Governing is also that. Not only appeal to an economic recovery – “Spain is an example around the world,” said Brisbane- is undoubtedly true, but citizens who vote vote, still not noticing. While, however, note well that here has been perhaps no longer tantalum political corruption, much dirty money has not been returned and governance forms and formulas from ‘Transition’ which is likely to change substantially, though perhaps not as vibrant wanted Pablo Iglesias, from top to bottom.
No comments:
Post a Comment