RTVE.es / AGENCIES
The prosecutor General of the State, Eduardo Torres-Dulce meets Wednesday at the dome of the prosecution to explain his intention to file suit for the alternative process 9N, after receiving the opposition from the Attorney Catalonia by its total disagreement with this measure.
As of 10:00 am, at the headquarters of the Attorney General, Torres-Dulce explain its decision to Member of the Board Prosecutors Chamber, an advisory body to the attorney general that make up the 26 members with the highest category of tax career and whose opinion is not binding, but always have in mind.
All indications are that Torres-Dulce intention is to fulfill the mandate of Article 27 of the Staff Attorney , which establishes the procedure when prosecutors there are internal discrepancies. However, if the Board of Procurators expresses its unequivocal rejection of the complaint, Torres-Dulce remain in a difficult position to either have not gained the support of the Catalan prosecutors.
The minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday the nine members of the Board of Procurators of Catalonia justifies the negative the chief prosecutor of Catalonia, José María Romero de Tejada, the filing of the lawsuit against the president of the Generalitat, Artur Mas, believing that the omission of an express Constitutional Court warning “appears to respond to a conscious decision” of this body.
Prosecutors point out that “the absence of specific order, accurate and specific means, obviously, the lack of a recipient with the same attributes.”
The document also remember that the State Attorney himself urged the inclusion of the statement “This last paragraph quoted was not reflected in the text of the resolution no room to infer that in matters of such importance was due to unintended forgetting. “
The forecast of the meeting is that in view of the discrepancies be the attorney general himself who will give the final order of the filing of the complaint” You heard the Board of the Chamber of Attorneys, “according to sources quoted by Efe tax.
No comments:
Post a Comment