The judge Mercedes Alaya enters Sevilla Courts. / Raul Caro (AP)
The Court of Seville has issued a decree annulling the civil bond of 29,568,129 euros that the judge Mercedes Alaya introduced in March 2014 and the former Minister Magdalena Alvarez exconsejera Andalusian, charged in the case of the ERE of Andalusia.
Alvarez, who resigned as vice president of the European Investment Bank (EIB) for its complaint in the case, appealed the bail, which consider Alaya won by one of the architects of an illegal aid scheme that lasted more a decade.
In a car of the seventh section of the audience, which Efe had access, revocation of bail is justified because “it is not to say that the instruction has advanced enough to understand necessary and reasonable “the action taken by the judge.
The Office acceded to the request of the defense of former minister and Hearing states that no appeal against the decision regarding bail now revoked.
In its order, the Court annuls the measures to meet the security was able to take the court Alaya, including but six properties in May five bank accounts exconsejera.
The Court also emphasized that “complex instruction” on the case “not only just started, but also has been cut or disrupted (at least, as to that particular factual object) to move to the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court on grounds of alleged gauging of various stakeholders. “
Adds Audience” virtually is to practice a very important part, at least, from the steps instructors of a personal nature ” .
The auto recalls that the Supreme is “the highest judicial organ of the ordinary cusp, whom he obviously can not be a real alien injunction” as the bond Alaya beat Alvarez, and, if it assumes jurisdiction of the case, is that which would have to adopt it.
The judge imposed bail to former minister after calculating that figure “roughly” taking into account aid granted until December 31, 2003 and since Alvarez served as Minister of Economy of the Government of Andalusia from 1994 to February 2004.
Alaya considered artificer “in collusion with others,” an “illegal procedure for granting subsidies “that lasted between 2000 and 2011, noting that the facts could constitute crimes of corruption and misappropriation of public funds.
The bond was intended, according to the judge, the return” as far as possible from the money that was illegally indiciariamente out of the treasury of the Board. “
No comments:
Post a Comment